Legalzoom claims there was never a written agreement between them and Seton and that “there is no rational basis for the lawsuit” according to Legalzoom co-founder Brian Liu. LegalZoom is not permitted to engage in the practice of law. LegalZoom offers easy, affordable, and personalized legal solutions and has served over four million customers across all 50 states and the U.K. Legal documents including Living Wills, Health Care Power of Attorney, Wills can be created by filling out online forms and the documents then mailed out.
Interactive Questionnaires That Generate Legal Documents the. In total, Seton received $1.6 million from Legalzoom since the venture. Emily McClure, LegalZoom and Online Legal Service Providers: Is the Development and Sale of. Legalzoom was paying Seton a fixed fee of $350 per completed application. Available documents include wills and living trusts, 3 business formation documents, 4 copyright registrations, and trademark applications. The complaint further alleges that Legalzoom stopped sending Seton the forms and stopped sharing any profits earned, yet Legalzoom retained the proprietary system, that Seton claims he created, on the Legalzoom website. is an American online legal technology company that helps its customers create legal documents without necessarily having to hire a lawyer. The complaint alleges that Seton and Legalzoom entered into a joint venture in which customers of legalzoom would fill out forms on the Legalzoom website, and those forms would be sent to Seton to finalize the formation of a nonprofit entity.
Seton sued Legalzoom on Februin Los Angeles Superior Court for breach of contract and misappropriation. Legalzoom, the legal self-filing service is facing a hefty lawsuit from a Los Angeles attorney Kent Seton, whose speciality is in forming non-profit corporations. Inc is an online provider of services that meet the legal needs of small businesses and consumers in the United States.
0 kommentar(er)
