Regardless, a lot of those asked confirmed that if they were thinking about ergonomics, the X52 leaves all other HOTAS systems in the dust. To be clear, according to Commanders using this system to play Elite: Dangerous on a daily basis, the X52 is far from perfect: It's not sturdy enough and prone to micro switch failures. It has not only enough buttons to be bound, but it's layout is also exactly of the right design for playing ED in the most optimal way possible.Īccording to and IGN review, the X52 is a good looking and ergonomic HOTAS system, which should be considered by many players as a very good option for flight simulators and space simulators. Many commanders answered that the Best HOTAS for Elite: Dangerous is Saitek X52 Flight Control System.Īccording to 82 players, the X52 is the only real option for game. To establish which HOTAS is the chosen one by ED Commanders, I went to the source - I asked members of the biggest in-game group of players called the Elite Dangerous Community. It shows off the serious complexity of the bindings and gives proper perspective to the subject - piloting your ship is the matter of in-game life or death. It's no wonder that most of the commanders in ED have decided to use different HOTAS systems to control their ships.īelow are the binding options for one of the most popular HOTAS control sticks. They're also able to operate all functions necessary to keep ED commanders alive in space. Hands on throttle-and-stick systems (or HOTAS) are the next best options because of their throttle and significant button and switch mapping, which is ready for immediate in-game binding.
One look at a cockpit in an ED space ship - and some basic knowledge about the game's complexity - makes it readily apparent that just any joystick will not do.
0 kommentar(er)
